Healthier Buildings on the Horizon

Code changes approved regarding toxic flame retardants in insulation

We are celebrating a huge victory! On January 16, 2019, the California State Building Standards Commission ruled unanimously that the state of California can safely update its codes to permit below-grade use of flame retardant-free foam plastic building insulation. This code change will allow the use of polystyrene insulation WITHOUT TOXIC FLAME RETARDANTS when the insulation is located beneath a concrete slab on grade. The code change is very significant because it sets a precedent for:

• Considering human and environmental health in building code development.
• Allowing the elimination of toxic flame retardants when shown, with testing, that fire safety can be achieved through other means.

Marjorie Smith, a Senior Associate at Siegel & Strain Architects, has been writing proposals, participating in working groups, and testifying at hearings since 2014 with the Green Science Policy Institute team. On January 16, Majorie testified at the state capitol in support of code changes alongside a team of toxicologists, public health advocates, combustion scientists, fire protection engineers, fire fighters, construction union leaders, legislators, developers, and architects.

Green Science Policy Institute, the lead advocate for this change, has been working toward this victory for more than 10 years. Their 2012 paper, "Flame retardants in building insulation: a case for reevaluating building codes," provided the basis for legislation (California AB-127) and proposals to change building codes to reduce the use of flame retardants in building insulation. With this success, more broad changes at the state and national level will be within reach.

To read more, please visit:
http://greensciencepolicy.org/topics/flame-retardants
http://greensciencepolicy.org/topics/healthier-insulation
 

Experts testify for code changes to allow insulation without toxic flame retardants.

HBCD bioaccumulates up the food chain (Covaci, 2006). Courtesy Green Science Policy Institute.

Holiday Greetings from Siegel & Strain Architects

This year, in addition to dinner and drinks, our Party Committee hosted the First Annual Holiday Cookie Decorating Competition. It was the perfect event for the company culture that exists at our firm: we love design and we love baked goods. The competition was tough, since some very talented spouses and kids also got in on the action. The winners were:

Most Tectonic: Seth

Most Festive: Sevan

Best Parti: Colin

Best Use of Color: Jill

Best in Show: Ray

'Twas three weeks before New Year's
And all through the house,
All the creatures were stirring
Maybe even a mouse.

The table was set with candles and care
With hopes that the food soon would be there.
The children were busy with games, toy trains and such,
While Colin set up cookies and decorating stuff.

With families arriving all decked out with style,
We settled ourselves around drinks for a while.
A banquet was laid with thought and with care,
We wined and dined until our plates were bare.

After a time there arose such a clatter,
Parents jumped up to see what was the matter.
Ollie and Gray had crashed their trains--what a sight!
Then popped the balloons with so much delight!

Now on to the kitchen where the cookies were laid.
With icing, sugary sparkles, the best would be made.
Now Festive! Tectonic! Parti! Colorful! Best in Show! too...
Visions of Sevan, Seth, Colin, Jill and Ray were all on view!

The cleanup was swift with all hands on deck.
Tamales were gone, salad and salmon, not a speck.
We all bundled up and drove out of sight,
Happy Holidays to all and to all a good night!

New tool review: Architecture 2030’s Carbon Smart Materials Palette

Published on the AIA Committee on the Environment blog KnowledgeNet

By Larry Strain, FAIA

In 2006, Ed Mazria woke up the design community by pointing out that buildings were responsible for a much larger portion of GHG emissions than we had previously been aware of. The current UN Environment Report puts it at close to 40-28 percent from building operations and 11 percent from the emissions embodied in making buildings. Architecture 2030 created the 2030 Challenge that laid out a road map to get to zero emissions. In the beginning, the 2030 Challenge focused on reducing operational energy and associated GHG emissions—the AIA 2030 Commitment is about reducing the operational energy and carbon emissions of our buildings.

In 2010, Architecture 2030 added the 2030 Challenge for Products, which set similar reduction goals for the embodied carbon in the materials and products we build with. This was mostly aimed at manufacturers and companies such as Interface, Central Concrete, United States Gypsum, and Owens Corning signed on.

In 2018 Architecture 2030 added another tool for reducing embodied carbon–the Carbon Smart Materials (CSM) Palette—an attribute-based guide to understanding and reducing embodied carbon in the built environment. The Palette opens with a reminder of why embodied carbon is important:

• 11% of global emissions, 28% of building sector emissions
• As buildings become more efficient, embodied emission are becoming increasingly significant.
• Embodied emissions of a building are locked in once the building is constructed and cannot be taken back or reduced.

They are also the first emissions a building is responsible for and can equal as much as 20 years worth of operating emissions. Reducing embodied emission reduces the upfront emissions from a building which is a critical step if we’re going to get to zero emissions by 2050.

The CSM Palette looks at a number of materials that are grouped into two categories:

• High Impact Materials – Concrete, Steel, Insulation and Wood
• Carbon Smart Materials – Hempcrete, Sheep’s wool, Straw and Wood. (wood is in both categories because it can have high impacts depending on how it is harvested and processed but is also is a carbon sequestering material)

Each material has its own page that opens with an explanation of the carbon impacts and attributes of the material, followed by advice on how to reduce those impacts. There is a Carbon Smart Attributes section that is about reducing the carbon footprint of the material itself, and a Design Guidance section that gives strategies on lowering carbon emissions through design.

 

The CSM Palette is great introduction to embodied carbon and how to reduce it - explanations and advice are clear and simple enough for someone unfamiliar with the topic to understand, but it’s also a good resource for those of us that have been working on this for a long time. For instance, I had never heard of the “scatter-filling aggregate” method of mixing concrete which can reduce the cement content of concrete by 20 – 30%. There are also additional resources at the end of each material page with links to papers, books and websites for those that want to take a deeper dive.

There is also a section on Whole Building Approaches with design advice for architects and engineers. It covers everything from - my personal favorite – reusing existing buildings, (significantly lower embodied carbon than building new buildings even with remodeling), to material efficiency, specifying materials manufactured with renewable energy, specifying materials that sequester carbon and a lot more.

The CSM Palette has been in development for about a year, and was launched at the Carbon Smart Building Day at the Global Climate Action Summit in September. Architecture 2030 worked with the Embodied Carbon Network, engineers, material experts and industry representatives to gather the most current information on embodied carbon and strategies and practices for reducing it.

My only real complaint is it needs more materials. The good news is there are a number of additional materials pages in development that will be coming out soon. I have been working on raising awareness on embodied carbon for the last 10 years and this is a great resource that’s only going to get better.

 

A couple of suggestions for making it even better:

• Give a little guidance on what to focus on. It is helpful to understand the relative carbon impacts of the materials we build with – high volume materials like concrete and steel and high impact materials like aluminum and some foam insulations have much larger impacts than interior finish materials and batt insulation.
• Make it clear who the strategies are aimed at. Some strategies aren’t very relevant for architects and engineers and are aimed more at product manufacturers.

Architecture 2030 welcomes feedback to the Carbon Smart Palette. Contact Erin McDade or Lindsey Rasmussen at Architecture 2030 via info@architecture2030.org.

Larry Strain, FAIA, is a founding principal of Siegel & Strain Architects (in Emeryville, California). He has written extensively about carbon and architecture (one example is his paper, “The Time Value of Carbon”). He served as an AIA Delegate to the Global Climate Action Summit in September in San Francisco.